#67 Jan/Feb 2004
The Washington Free Press Washington's Independent Journal of News, Ideas & Culture
Home  |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory 

Regulars

Reader Mail

Northwest & Beyond

Nature Doc

Issues On Film

Good Ideas from Different Countries

Features

Two more winners in our ongoing rubber ducky essay contest!

Duck Essay Contest Rules

Politics

Administration's Facade of Credibility Erodes
Official investigations are slowly prying out information on 9/11, butwith considerable obstacles
by Rodger Herbst

Emerging Democratic Majority: So What?
It makes no difference until Dems move to suburbs, or we get a fairelectoral system
by Steven Hill and Rob Richie

Voting Your Global Conscience
The Simultaneous Policy offers an ingenious scheme to take back theworld
by Syd Baumel

The Coalition of the Smelling

Economy

Low Income Credit Union Opens Doors
press release from TULIP

Workplace

Golden Parachute (of Revenge)
by anonymous

Illegal Economy
Wal-Mart immigration sting leads to policy changes
by Briana Olson

Books

Beyond Capitalism
book review by Dave Zink

Protest Primer

Toward a Toxic-Free Future

Dirt-y Secrets
Vashon Islanders learn to limit exposure to persistent toxins
by Kari Mosden

Toxic Breastmilk
news and ideas from Washington Toxics Coalition
by Sibyl Diver and Laurie Valeriano

Nature

Lost Orca No 'Free Willy'
by Hanna Lee

Health

The Vaccine Conflict
UPI Investigates
by Mark Benjamin, UPI Investigations Editor

Law

Solidarity With Leonard Peltier
March and Rally in Tacoma
by Steve Hapy Jr, Arthur J. Miller, and Tacoma Leonard Peltier Support

Who Killed Dr. Martin Luther King Jr?
Interview with King family attorney William F. Pepper by Joe Martin

Illegal Economy

by Briana Olson

"Wal-Mart's commitment to diversity is getting noticed," reads a story on Wal-Mart News, the company's self-laudatory news site. The author referred to products offered at Wal-Mart stores in celebration of Hispanic Heritage Month, but the news of an investigation of the corporation's complicity in contracting illegal immigrants, many of them Mexican, has made far more headlines than the addition of specialized calendars to their shelves. Some 250 illegal immigrants arrested on October 23, when the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (BICE) orchestrated a successful sting operation at Wal-Mart stores across the nation, have been released and await invitations to return to immigration court. According to Garrison Courtney of BICE, decisions on their individual cases could take years. The case against Wal-Mart could take as long.

In the unlikely event that all 250 janitorial workers are deported within a year's time, 250,000 others will have arrived (or become illegal due to the expiration of a visa) to take their places in the lowest paid sectors of our economy. Approximately 8 million people reside illegally in the United States; of those, an estimated five million participate in the US labor force, often working for less than minimum wage and receiving few, if any, benefits. Nearly 60 percent of these workers were born in Mexico. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, 20 percent of them labor in manufacturing, 12 percent toil in construction, 14 percent work in restaurants, and 20-25 percent perform the strenuous work that underpins the booming business of agriculture. Others find posts as janitors, landscapers, and securities guards. Due to their illegal status, these workers have little bargaining power; "One of our concerns," said Courtney, "is the exploitation of workers in the United States". Given the BICE's position as a law enforcement agency, though, it offers only one alternative: going home.

Attorney James Linsey has another idea: sue the company for racketeering. His case against Wal-Mart on behalf of erstwhile janitors will not protect them from deportation, but if successful would build on preceding victories for illegal employees who have been overworked and underpaid. This could lead employers to treat illegal employees more fairly, but most workers are unlikely to prosecute unless already threatened with deportation.

According to Congressman Tom Tancredo of Colorado, "displaced legal workers ought to be the ones suing Wal-Mart and its subcontractors". His proposed reforms increase security spending and terminate guest worker programs until the completion of a national exit-entry system; since no one knows how long that will take, this spells indefinite suspension of such programs. Tancredo's Press Secretary Carlos Espinosa says the goal of the Border Enforcement and Revolving Employment to Assist Laborers (BE REAL Act), is "to secure America's borders". With the help of unmanned flight craft, says Espinosa, a soldier can man a mile of border territory; a mere 200 people could monitor the Mexican-American border. Tancredo imagines that additional hires in BICE can take care of rounding up the eight million people that have already made it through.

Not all Republicans share Tancredo's quixotic visions. Arizona Congressmen Jim Kolbe and Jeff Flake have authored legislation promising to tackle the border issue as well as the problem of illegal workers in the US. Those already here would pay $1500 to gain legal status for three years of work; if employers wished to bring foreign workers in for a three year stint, they would petition to do so and prove that they'd advertised the job to native Americans first. This bill has fairly broad support, and John McCain has introduced similar legislation in the Senate.

A bill known as "Agjobs" may have the greatest chance of passing. Created through the cooperation of the United Farmworkers union (UFW) and representatives of the agribusiness industry, it would legalize 500,000 farm workers and immediate family members over the course of six years. Those in the industry understand their dependence on illegal labor and don't look forward to losing a trained work force to BICE raids. Rosalinda Guillen, Executive Director of LUPE and former National Vice President of UFW, said, "What's important to us is keeping families together".

Tancredo complains that such bills reward lawbreakers; his dreamy-eyed nativist approach frames immigration as a moral issue. When viewed as an economic issue, its effects look decidedly less negative. Wal-Mart displaced high-school dropouts, if anyone, by hiring illegally. It's certainly true that the nine percent of Americans without diplomas could compete more easily with legal employees than with illegal immigrant workers. But by sending money home, immigrant workers improve the Mexican economy and decrease the likelihood of future mass migrations to the US. In addition, Daniel Griswold cites 2002 findings by the President's Council of Economic Advisors that immigrants raise the income of Americans by $1-10 billion per year. Hardliners like Tancredo, however, spend little time lamenting illegally low prices.



Bookmark and Share



Google
WWW Washington Free Press

The Washington Free Press
PMB #178, 1463 E Republican ST, Seattle WA 98112 WAfreepress@gmail.com

Donate free food
Home |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory