article below posted May 13, 2010
cartoon by Dan McConnell
Kagan in Context: Shafting Progressive Values
by Norman Solomon
If President Obama has his way, Elena Kagan will replace John
Paul Stevens — and the Supreme Court will move rightward. The nomination
is very disturbing, especially because it’s part of a pattern.
The White House is in the grip of conventional centrist wisdom.
Grim results stretch from Afghanistan to the Gulf of Mexico to
communities across the USA.
“It turns out, by the way, that oil
rigs today generally don’t cause spills,” President Obama said in
support of offshore oil drilling, less than three weeks before the April
20 blowout in the Gulf. “They are technologically very advanced.”
On numerous policy fronts, such conformity to a centrist
baseline has smothered hopes for moving this country in a progressive
direction. Now, the president has taken a step that jeopardizes civil
liberties and other basic constitutional principles.
“During the
course of her Senate confirmation hearings as Solicitor General, Kagan
explicitly endorsed the Bush administration’s bogus category of ‘enemy combatant,’ whose implementation has been a war crime in its own right,”
University of Illinois law professor Francis Boyle noted last month.
“Now, in her current job as U.S. Solicitor General, Kagan is
quarterbacking the continuation of the Bush administration’s illegal and
unconstitutional positions in U.S. federal court litigation around the
country, including in the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Boyle added:
“Kagan has said ‘I love the Federalist Society.’ This is a right-wing
group; almost all of the Bush administration lawyers responsible for its
war and torture memos are members of the Federalist Society.”
The departing Justice Stevens was a defender of civil liberties.
Unless the Senate refuses to approve Kagan for the Supreme Court, the
nation’s top court is very likely to become more hostile to civil
liberties and less inclined to put limits on presidential power.
Here is yet another clear indication that progressives must
mobilize to challenge the White House on matters of principle.
Otherwise, history will judge us harshly — and it should.
cartoon by John Jonik
For
more than 15 months, evidence has mounted that President Obama routinely
combines progressive rhetoric with contrary actions. As one bad decision
after another has emanated from the Oval Office, some progressives have
favored denial — even though, if the name “Bush” or “McCain” had been
attached to the same presidential policies, the same progressives would
have been screaming bloody murder.
But enabling bad policies,
with silent acquiescence or anemic dissent, encourages more of them. At
this point, progressive groups and individuals who pretend that Obama’s
policies merely need a few tweaks, or just suffer from a few anomalous
deficiencies, are whistling past a political graveyard.
At the
same time, with less than six months to go before Election Day, there
are very real prospects of a big Republican victory that could shift
majority control of Congress. Progressives have a huge stake in averting
a GOP takeover on Capitol Hill.
The corporate-military centrism
of the Obama administration has demoralized and demobilized the
Democratic Party’s largely progressive base — the same base that swept
Nancy Pelosi into the House Speaker’s office and then Barack Obama into
the White House. National polls now show Democrats to be much less
enthusiastic about voting in November than their Republican
counterparts.
The conventional political wisdom (about as
accurate as the claim that “oil rigs today generally don’t cause
spills”) is that when a Democratic president moves rightward, his party
gains strength against Republicans. But Democrats reaped the whirlwind
of that pseudo-logic in 1994 — after President Clinton shafted much of
the Democratic base by pushing through the corporate NAFTA trade pact
against the wishes of labor, environmental and human-rights
constituencies. That’s how Newt Gingrich and other right-wing zealots
got to run Congress starting in January 1995.
For progressives,
giving the Obama administration one benefit of the doubt after another
has not prevented matters from getting worse.
At the moment,
U.S. troop levels are nearing 100,000 in Afghanistan.
Massive
quantities of oil are belching into the Gulf of Mexico.
The
White House has signaled de facto acceptance of a high unemployment rate
for several more years, while offering weak GOP-lite countermeasures
like tax breaks for businesses.
Nuclear power subsidies are
getting powerful support from both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, while
meaningful action against global warming is nowhere in sight.
The Justice Department continues to backtrack on civil
liberties.
And now, if the president’s nomination of Elena Kagan
is successful, the result will move the Supreme Court to the right.
Progressives should fight the Kagan nomination.
Norman Solomon is
national co-chair of the Healthcare Not Warfare campaign, launched by
Progressive Democrats of America. His books include “War Made Easy: How
Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” For more information,
go to: www.normansolomon.com.
◆