#72 November/December 2004
The Washington Free Press Washington's Independent Journal of News, Ideas & Culture
Home  |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer 

FREE THOUGHTS

FIRST WORD by Doug Collins
What's Wrong With Us?

READER MAIL
Israel: not a charitable nonprofit, Bush's second big lie: social security, Good alternative to third runway was ignored, More guardianship abuses, Thanks for the Truth

NORTHWEST & BEYOND
Wild sky can't fly past Pembo, Oregon's Coos County pays in pipeline lawsuit, Poverty with a view, Roadless Rule revision postponed past election, Western Shoshone battle federal landgrab, Montana's Jewish communities embrace reform

"Just because..."
strange assertions observed by Styx Mundstock

CONTACTS

NORTHWEST NEIGHBORS
contact list for progressives

DO SOMETHING! CALENDAR
Northwest activist events

POLITICS AND ELECTIONS

9/11 Update: New York State Attorney General's office accepts 9/11 Complaint
by Rodger Herbst

Book Notice: Claiming the Mantle: How Presidential Nominations Are Won and Lost Before the Votes Are Cast
by R. Lawrence Butler

"Modern Poll Tax" is Challenged in WA: Ex-felons deserve the right to vote
from the ACLU of WA

Next Steps after the 2004 Elections
by Steven Hill

LAW

NutraSweet Hit by Lawsuits: Court action highlights health concerns about artificial sweeteners
by Doug Collins

Justice Department Manipulates Truth About Patriot Act Ruling
from the ACLU

After the Riot
anonymous account of prison conditions

WORKPLACE

Bon Macy's Fails Employees' Health-Care Needs
from SEIU Local 6

San Francisco hotel workers locked out
photos and story by David Bacon

Small Business Administration Fails in Commitment to Women-Owned Firms
from the US Women's Chamber of Commerce

IMMIGRATION AND MEXICAN LABOR

HOW U.S. CORPORATIONS WON THE DEBATE OVER IMMIGRATION
by David Bacon

Illegal Immigration: Another Way to Outsource Jobs?
opinion by Domenico Maceri

Salsa and Apple Pie
A U.S.-Mexican Union in the making
by Steven Hill

ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH

Existing Systems Do Not Protect Us
by Sarah Westervelt

Mercury on the mind: Want to avoid both autism and Alzheimers? Then forget the flu vaccine and avoid dental amalgams
by Donald W. Miller, Jr, MD

What Water to Drink? Tap water may be your healthiest option
by Seth Gordon

MEDIA

MEDIA BEAT by Normal Solomon
The Presidential pageant: "There he is, Mr. America..."

People Like This Paper! So why is it so small?
by Doug Collins

CULTURE

A New Yorker Trapped in Los Angeles
excerpt from Willaim Blum's book: "Freeing the World to Death"

Poetry by Robert Hosheit

Beatnik Books
poetic reviews by Robert Pavik

GOOD IDEAS FROM DIFFERENT COUNTRIES by Doug Collins
Polish Jokes

Small Business Administration Fails in Commitment to Women-Owned Firms

from the US Women's Chamber of Commerce

In a recent press release distributed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) several claims are made regarding the commitment of the SBA to the growth and prosperity of women-owned firms. The U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce (USWCC) believes many of these claims to be misleading, painting a far rosier picture of funding and business growth assistance to women-owned firms than actually exists across America.

Support for women businesses in federal contracting falls short

The SBA reports strong growth and support for women-owned firms in federal contracting. The details tell a very different story. Even though privately-held women-owned businesses represent 30 percent of the businesses in the U.S., they still receive just 2.98 percent of federal contracts. The federal government has never achieved its extraordinarily low goal of 5 percent contracting with women-owned businesses. In FY 2003 alone, this failure represented a loss of $5.6 billion for women-owned businesses.

Between FY 2002 and FY 2003, total federal procurement dollars grew by nearly $50 billion (30 percent) while spending with women-owned firms grew only $1.5 billion. If the government's five percent goal for spending with women-owned firms had been reached, spending growth with women should have reached $2.5 billion; there's a shortfall of $1 billion for women-owned firms. And, because women-owned firms received only 2.98 percent of all federal procurement dollars in FY 2003, the total shortfall reached nearly $6 billion in just one year.

"While the SBA and other government groups believe they have something to cheer about, our members-more than 150,000 women business owners and economic development leaders across the country-say, 'Hold on'," says Margot Dorfman, USWCC CEO. "We are too far away from achieving an equitable share of federal contract dollars to be doing any kind of celebrating."

SBA refuses to implement the Women's Procurement Program

Public Law 106-554 (the Women's Procurement Program) was signed into law nearly four years ago providing a targeted set-aside program for women-owned firms in industries underrepresented in federal contracting to help federal agencies increase their purchasing with women-owned firms. However, the SBA has done everything possible to stop the implementation of this important program to assist women business owners.

At a recent meeting, SBA Administrator Hector Barreto told leaders of the USWCC the current administration has no intention of implementing P.L.106-554 even though it is law. Barreto has not budgeted or requested the necessary funds, nor has he included the establishment of regulations for this program in his biannual listing of proposed regulatory actions.

Lending to women-owned firms doesn't keep up with growth of the market

The SBA claims record-breaking performance for lending to women. The reality is that women receive fewer loans and loans of smaller size than their male counterparts. The disparity between the number of women-owned firms and their access to capital through the SBA is alarming.

According to Terry Williams, president of the National Procurement Council, the USWCC's affiliate procurement trade association, between FY 1998 and FY 2003 women-owned firms experienced the most dramatic increase ever in the number and financial growth of their firms. The number of women-owned firms grew 23 percent and their revenues grew 46 percent. During this same time, however, there was actually a 7.5 percent decrease in the average value of loans made to women-owned businesses utilizing U.S. Small Business Administration programs.

Also, during this dramatic growth period, the percentage share of SBA-backed loans provided to women-owned firms grew only 1.1 percent. So, the "record breaking" performance was actually a miniscule increase over five years even though the number of women-owned firms grew by more than 20 percent and their revenues increased nearly 50 percent.

"Clearly, SBA-backed lending to women is not keeping up with the increased number of women-owned firms," Williams notes. "This lack of equal access to capital leaves women-owned firms at a significant competitive disadvantage and hinders their ability to be successful in federal contracting.

"In a clear expression of the SBA support of access to capital for women, Melanie Sablehaus, deputy SBA administrator, testified before the House of Representatives Committee on Small Business on May 12, 2004: 'Women-owned businesses require less as far as loan size.'," Williams adds. "It's been our experience that a plant expansion, R&D bills, technology upgrades, and even office chairs cost about the same when either women or men are writing the check. We're dumbfounded by the SBA's statement and reluctance to administer equitable funding practices."

SBA commitment lacking

"The U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce believes the SBA should be a strong champion of women-owned firms," Dorfman reiterates. "Our members do receive valuable support from many regional SBA representatives...but to really move the needle, we need leadership and commitment from Washington.

"It's clear women-owned firms are acquiring less capital and less federal procurement dollars than their male counterparts. We simply ask the SBA to tell the real story regarding their performance for women-owned firms; implement Public Law 106-554, the Women's Procurement Program; seek adequate funding for their agency; and work harder to bring equal access to capital for women-owned firms," Dorfman says.

For more information, please see the USWCC full-feature Web site: www.uswomenschamber.com or contact Jill Van Dierendonck at (800) 738-0653 or (888) 418-7922. The U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce(TM) is the pre-eminent national women's chamber of commerce network whose mission is to develop leaders, accelerate economic growth and provide a community voice for women.


The Washington Free Press
PMB #178, 1463 E Republican ST, Seattle WA 98112
WAfreepress@gmail.com

Donate free food
Google
Search the Free Press archive:

WWW
Washington Free Press
Home |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory