Send your letters to the WA Free Press, PMB #178, 1463 E Republican St,
Seattle 98112, or WAfreepress@gmail.com. Please include your full name and
phone number for verification. Keep them short. Letters may be edited for
length, spelling and grammar. Letters printed do not necessarily reflect the
opinion of the Free Press. Letters which respond to Free Press articles will be
given precedence.
Israel: Not a Charitable
Nonprofit
With interest, I read Annette Thomas' letter in your Sept/Oct
2004 issue, as the title was "US Taxpayers Fund Palestinian Heartache". Thus,
I'd hoped she'd have mentioned that Israel is the ONLY nation to which US
taxpayers who donate to its government can deduct that donation from their
taxable income on our tax returns. If I were to donate $1000 to the Lebanese
government (where many Palestinian refugee camps are), I could not "take it off
my income tax"; if I donated it to Israel, I could. Is this fair? Is it a valid
way to increase our federal deficit?
Winfield Hutton,
Shoreline
Bush's Second Big Lie: Social Security
The Bush
regime is a master of spin, deception and mendacity. They need to be to sell
their radical plans for an America none of us will recognize. For they envision
an America at continual war, led by God, with an unbelievably wealthy elite and
the rest of us with no safety net, no retirement, no public schools and
desperate for jobs sent offshore.
Here's how it works. Want a long
sought goal of an Iraq invasion? Bypass the usual intelligence agencies and rely
on "information" from parallel groups stuffed with right-wing radicals. Sell the
docile media and trusting citizens on "weapons of mass destruction". What, no
WMDs? Tell 'em that we're spreading democracy instead of bombs and death, an
"al-Qaida connection", etc.
Want a tax cut for your wealthy friends?
Tell the docile media and trusting citizens you're sharing a slice of the
projected budget surpluses engineered by a previous administration. When the
projected surplus disappears amid the red ink of the Iraq invasion? Tell 'em the
tax cut is to produce jobs. And you can do it again!!
What do you do
when the projected surplus becomes a sea of red ink far, far into the future as
a result of Iraq and the tax cuts for your wealthy friends? Just trot out Alan
Greenspan of Federal Reserve fame and have him pronounce that we're forced to
reduce Social Security benefits, i. e. steal more funds from Social Security to
make up the difference.
What's been under reported is the Bush success
through the 2001 tax cut in picking Americans' pockets and raiding the Social
Security Trust Fund.
The 2001 tax cut is spread over 10 years at a
stated cost of $1.35 trillion, but costs over $2.5 trillion. The 2001 tax cut
delivered at least 40 percent of the tax benefits, including repeal of the
estate tax, to one percent of the population (the wealthy, elite friends of the
Bush administration).
The 2001 tax cut is now producing budget deficits
of at least $570 billion and will for the foreseeable future. The Bush spin is
that the war on terror and/or massive government spending is causing the annual
budget deficit of $570 billion, but the fact is the deficit is caused by the
2001 tax cut benefiting the rich elites.
Bush and Congress could
materially reduce these deficits by repeal of part or all of the 2001 tax cut.
However, the right wing would have to release it's stranglehold on the social
safety net spending which it's vowed to destroy.
Bush mouthpiece and
Fed. Chairman Alan Greenspan stated recently that we need to lower the
expectations of future benefits to retirees. Guess Alan knows that Social
Security won't be there when needed because it's being raided to cover the Bush
tax cuts for the wealthy elite.
Howard Pellett, Anacortes
Good Alternative to Third Runway was Ignored
In
response to Alaska Airlines and other airlines who see little alternative to
completing a third runway at SeaTac Airport, I offer the following.
In
about 1994-95, there was much discussion on the west side of the Puget Sound
concerning where to locate a second bridge. The 1991 Cross-Sound Transportation
Study funded by the state of Washington and implemented by a Bellevue
engineering firm did a comprehensive study for the movement of people and goods
across the Puget Sound. One of the engineering options was a transportation
corridor across Vashon Island using underwater buoyant tubes. This would have
connected the north end of SeaTac Airport to the Port Orchard and Bremerton
area. Southwest of Bremerton is Bremerton National Airport.
One of the
ideas floating around was to make Bremerton National Airport an international
airport (which is technically feasible). This would have eliminated the need for
a third runway at SeaTac, as well as the need for a second Narrows bridge. It
would have also supported an underwater, underground transportation system
across Vashon Island.
At the release of the Cross-Sound Transportation
Study it was payola time in Olympia. The money people and politicians would not
have it.
D. H. Dickson, Monroe
More Guardianship
Abuses
[In response to letter on guardianship agency abuses in the
July/Aug 2004 issue] Let me tell you my experience with an appointed
Guardian.
In 1987, my son Ronnie Hodges, age 40, died a horrible death
in a state licensed and approved "group home" in Solano, California. When he was
found, his deceased body was covered with ants. Although the home was supposed
to be inspected every three months, it was found to be "in such a filthy,
unsanitary condition that it had become infested with vermin".
Where
was his Guardian? Most certainly not acting on Ronnie's behalf. We sued the
home. We settled out of court for several thousand dollars, however, the money
was not my main motive. I wanted the home to be closed so that no other person
would have to go through such agony.
I contacted California Senator
Boxer through a letter. She replied but did nothing. I went to the licensing
board. They did nothing. I talked to the Patient Advocates. They did nothing. I
did not know what else to do or who to go to. Every few years I go back to
California and pass flyers about telling people the way Ronnie died. But, the
group home is still in business. It was not closed even for one
day.
So, I ask, "Where was Ronnie's Guardian? What was his Guardian
doing?" Obviously nothing. I was in Washington State at the time Ronnie was
moved to this home four months before [his death], and unable to check the
quality of the home myself and so ignorant that I trusted and believed the
Guardian would check it before placing him there.
I have enclosed a
copy of the Coroner's Report [not here published] thinking maybe some other
parent will read this and not put their blind faith in a Guardian such as I
did.
Bettye Dryden, Bonney Lake
Editor's note: Other
readers who have experienced guardianship agency abuses are invited to submit
your accounts for publication.
Thanks for the Truth
Let
me start by saying that I love your paper. I have only recently come across your
wonderful paper and would like to receive more if it is possible. I am currently
incarcerated and find such "true news" to be uniquely comforting. I would be
more than happy to contribute artwork or even some stamps for postage if you
would need or be interested in them. Thank you for the truth.
Willis
Clary, Teague TX
Editor's note: Thanks for your encouragement
and kindness! By the way, subscriptions are free to prisoners, but your
contribution of artwork or donation of stamps would certainly be appreciated.
(Note: we send subscriptions via presorted mail, but we do use a lot of standard
stamps for renewal notice letters, so stamps are indeed useful. We operate on
the leanest of budgets, and everything helps.)
We can't
guarantee publication of article or artwork submissions, but we like to receive
them, and we enjoy bringing many of them to print each issue.
|