Instant Runoff Voting
the best answer to WAshington's primary-Election dilemma
from IRV Washington
Many in Washington State have become bewildered and upset by the recent
court mandated outlawing of the popular "blanket primary." Instant
Runoff Voting (IRV) proponents believe they have the solution. It is
the Initiative to legislators 318 (I-318) which solves the problem by
eliminating partisan primaries and replacing them with voter ranking of
candidates in a single IRV election. IRV, they contend, is far superior
to either of the two rival substitutes, the "Montana primary" and the
"Louisiana" which are currently embroiled in editorial debates, legal
disputes and in challenges by referendum and initiative.
If IRV I-318 supporters get over 197,734 valid petition signatures on
this initiative to the legislators between now and December 2004 then
I-318 will be presented to the legislature when the legislative session
for 2005 begins. The legislature then could adopt it, but if not I-318
would go to the voters who could make it the law by a 50% majority vote
for it in the fall of 2005.
"Initiative 318 gives the voters all the freedom of choice they had
under the blanket primary -- and much more," according to Brent White,
long-time advocate for Instant Runoff Voting. "In ranking all the
candidates in order of preference, voters are not bound by party labels
and accomplish what they did in a blanket primary and only have to turn
out to the polls one time a year instead of two. This also results in a
great savings to Washington tax payers." According to the Washington
Secretary of State Office, the elimination of the primary will save an
estimated 13 million dollars per election cycle.
Some Democratic and Republican leaders are opposed to the elimination of
the primary because they will be forced to fund their own nominating
conventions for their candidates. It also should be noted that there is
the notion held by many voters in Washington State that taxpayers should
not have to pay for parties to select their own candidates.
In addition, supporters argue that with IRV the "primary" process is not
necessary. White explains that "IRV is like a series of runoff
elections all rolled into one. Here's how it works: Say my favorite
candidate receives five percent of the first choice votes, whereas two
front runners received 30-some percent each. My candidate is then out
of the contest, but my second choice is now counted. The same thing
happens with all other ballots for the eliminated candidate, i.e., those
ballots are recounted and votes are redistributed to the second choices
of those voters. This process continues until only one candidate wins
by a majority of 50 percent not something like a 37 percent plurality as
often happens in a field of 3 or more candidates."
"It should be pointed out that IRV, by result of ranking your preferred
candidates, avoids the 'spoiler problem' caused by minor party
candidates siphoning off votes from the major party standard bearers,"
says Jerry Cronk, Shoreline attorney and chief drafter of the
initiative. "And with IRV," he notes, "every voter is free to vote his
or her conscience, not having to worry about 'wasting' a vote on a
worthy but dark-horse candidate."
IRV is the voting method used in Australia, London and Ireland. IRV has
also been approved by voters in San Francisco and will soon be
implemented there as well. IRV supporters in the U.S. come from all
parts of the political spectrum and there is growing interest in this
voting method.
"Many Democrats support this, many Republicans support this, third
parties across philosophical boundaries to the left and right support
this," White said.
IRV proponents say Initiative 318 is more democratic, will invigorate
election turnout and would be a giant step forward for freedom of choice
and fairness in Washington elections.
According to Taryn Gearhart, IRV I-318 campaign manager, this effort is
a grassroots campaign made possible by non-paid signature gatherers who
are committed to helping Washington State evolve the voting process into
a more effective and fair method. The campaign is currently mobilizing
the base of IRV supporters in Washington State to accomplish this end.
Gearhart says, "We are currently standing on the edge of either having a
poor replacement for the now defunct blanket primary or actually moving
towards real meaningful electoral reform". Instant Runoff Voting has
been explored by the Washington State Legislature and they know what the
merits of it are. Regardless, there has been a failure to mention IRV
in the dialogue surrounding the issue.
IRV and I-318 have received limited attention by the media thus far.
Supporters of Instant Runoff Voting I-318 are trying to change that and
show that IRV I-318 voters are clearly the winners.
For a more in-depth overview of Instant Runoff Voting I-318, to sign in
to help and to see how it compares to other voting methods being
proposed to solve the voting method dilemma please visit the IRV I-318
website at www.IRVWA.org
or call Toll free 1-866-IRVWAORG.
|