#62 March/April 2003
The Washington Free Press Washington's Independent Journal of News, Ideas & Culture
Home  |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory 

Regulars

Reader Mail

Northwest & Beyond

Envirowatch

Good Ideas from Different Countries

Bob's Random Legal Wisdom

MediaBeat

Workplace Issues

Issues On Film

Features

Silent Blue Angels
essay by Signe Drake

Spy Agency Busts Union
Federal employees no longer entitled to union representation
by Brian Frielb

What's the Hangup with Solar Energy?
Rapid conversion is possible in Washington
opinion by Martin Nix

The Rubber Ducky Dilemma
Keep Ernie happy: explain the Defective Ducky Dilemma and win a free subscription
by Doug Collins

American Newspeak
word collisions by Wayne Grytting

Answers to last issue's 'Great American Newspeak Quiz'
by Wayne Grytting

Bayer, Monsanto Poison Norway
from CBG network

Poisoning Ourselves
Toxic waste in fertilizer
by Rodger Herbst

Urban Runoff Killing Washington Salmon
by J.R. Pegg, ENS

Population, Grain, Windmills...
Twelve Ways to Tell if the Earth is Healthy
by Earth Policy Institute

The Shell Game
Environmental Laws of Mass Destruction
opinion by Rodger Herbst

Fuel-Cell Cars to Arrive Soon
by Bernie Fischlowitz-Roberts, Earth Policy Institute

Russian Big Oil Redraws Pipe Dream
by Rory Cox

Hepatitis B: Rare, and Not Very Contagious
by Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president, National Vaccine Information Center

'Iraq was not responsible for 9/11'
excerpts from a speech by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio)

WA Peace Team visits Baghdad
by Gary Engbrecht

Waiting for the Missiles
Prospect of US Bombs Terrorizes Iraqis
by Norman Solomon

A Louder Call to Action
In Shifting Sands: The Truth About UNSCOM and the Disarming of Iraq
Directed by Scott Ritter
film review by Bob Hicks

'Democracy U' Video Series Available

Members First
Service Employees union local has its first contested election in anyone's memory
opinion by Brian King

SICK LEAVE Relief

Mexico Controversy Dominates Costco Meeting
from Community Alliance for Global Justice

Pasco Ordinance Bars Services for Low-Income Community
from Washington ACLU

Public NEEDS Sensible Hepatitis B Vaccine Policies
opinion by Doug Collins

Seattle Poster Ban Still Not Clear

Urban Runoff Killing Washington Salmon

by J.R. Pegg, ENS

Every time it rains in Seattle, the storm water sweeps a wide array of urban pollutants into the city's creeks. Faced with mounting evidence that this runoff is killing endangered salmon, state and city officials are wrestling with the economic and environmental consequences of new plans to further protect the city's creeks. A new report from the National Marine Fisheries Service compares a West Seattle creek, which has undergone extensive rehabilitation efforts, with a rural creek outside the city.

During the six-week study, the scientists found that 88 percent of the coho salmon entering the urban creek died within a few hours, most before spawning, while only one fish that entered the rural stream perished.

The scientists have not yet reached a final conclusion, but water quality is the primary suspect. The researchers plan to examine samples from the dead fish for evidence of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, compounds found in automobile exhaust and other air pollutants which eventually make their way into the water. "Storm water has a definite, undeniable effect on the survival of these fish," said Department of Ecology director Tom Fitzsimmons. "The water's got to be cleaned." But the city has spent some $26 million since 1999 to protect its creeks from pollution and degradation. For example, Longfellow creek, the urban stream selected for the study, is considered a model for stream rehabilitation projects, featuring carefully replanted banks and manmade gravel beds for spawning salmon. A range of local activists, including the community group Yes for Seattle, and the local chapter of Sierra Club, are now calling for more extensive efforts through a plan called Initiative 80, which many have dubbed Save Seattle Creeks.

The plan would require the city to develop a long term creek restoration plan, with developers assisting with creek restoration. It calls for tighter storm water regulations and a ban on pesticide use on public lands adjacent to creeks. The initiative also requires the city to "daylight" some creeks that have been directed into underground pipes.

The plan could cost about $5 per household, or some $1.3 million per year. Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels supports reducing pesticide use and matching funds for volunteer restorations. Restoration projects would be selected by a new Citizens Oversight Committee, consisting of scientific, environmental, business and community interests. Critics argue the measure fails to reign in private development and relies far too much on voluntary efforts.

Already in Washington seven species of salmon and steelhead are listed as threatened or endangered. Conservationists estimate only one percent of the historic wild salmon population still exists.



Bookmark and Share



Google
WWW Washington Free Press

The Washington Free Press
PMB #178, 1463 E Republican ST, Seattle WA 98112 WAfreepress@gmail.com

Donate free food
Home |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory