#79 January/February 2006
The Washington Free Press Washington's Independent Journal of News, Ideas & Culture
Home  |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer 

TOP STORIES

The Aborted Voyage
No Gilligan's Island and no warm welcome back for real deckhands
by John Merriam

Appreciating the Bitter
part 1: Should the poor orphan child really be saved by a miracle?
by Doug Collins

Inside Syria
For now it's safe, but the Hariri assassination looms
by Joel Hanson

FREE THOUGHTS

NORTHWEST & BEYOND compiled by Sharlynn Cobaugh
Hatchery fish same as wild?; Dousing wilderness with pesticides; Open-source software movement growing; Department of Peace proposed in Senate; Genetically modified alfalfa deregulated; Biotech industry seeks to reverse local bans on GE crops

READER MAIL
Bush's personal agenda; Don't forget the high gas prices of last year; Migration across the southern border; Victims of divorce court, unite!

In Memoriam
John Glansbeek, 1945-2005
by Doug Collins

MEDIA BEAT by Norman Solomon
Congratulations to the worst media performances of the year

CONTACTS/ACTIVISM

NORTHWEST NEIGHBORS
contact list of subscribers who like to talk with you

DO SOMETHING! CALENDAR
Northwest activist events

POLITICS

Lessons for Political Reformers
Campaign finance reform is a start, but the big obstacle is winner-take-all voting
by Steven Hill

The Coming Year
by Don Monkerud

HEALTH CARE

Seattle Votes for a Right to Health Care
Will other cities do it too?
by Brian King

Illegal Immigrants Not a Burden on Health Care
by Domenico Maceri

WORKPLACE

Temp World
part 2 (conclusion)
by Margie M. Mitchell

Worker's Rights are Human Rights
photo and caption by David Bacon

RIGHTS

China On the Rise?
Recent media event calls attention to problems the world cannot ignore
by Hannah Lee

'Extraordinary Rendition' of Innocent Man
CIA named in lawsuit along with companies that operated airplanes used in kidnapping
from the ACLU

ENVIRONMENT

Trash Talk Contest Winner!
...plus wacky and wonderful conservation tips
various contributors

NASA Plutonium Launch; Seattle, Portland Safer for Pedestrians
various contributors

WAR

White House Refuses to Comply with Request for Pre-war Intelligence
by David Swanson

RIGHT BRAIN

The Wanderings and Thoughts of Kip Kellogg
by Vincent Spada

PUMPKIN EDDIE'S LIGHTNING POEMSby Vincent Spada
Dry bones sittin' by the road

BOOKS

MY FAVORITE BOOK
The Continuum Concept by Jean Liedloff
review by Doug Collins

BOOK NOTICE
Towards Understanding by Lillian Brummet

White House Refuses to Comply With Request for Pre-War Intelligence

by David Swanson

House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff members report that the White House and the Departments of State and Defense have for more than six months refused to comply with a request filed under the Freedom of Information Act by 52 Congress Members--a request seeking information on the Bush Administration's reasons for going to war.

Last June, Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers Jr. (D, Mich.) and 51 other Congress Members submitted a FOIA request to the White House, the Department of Defense, and the Department of State seeking documents and materials concerning the Downing Street Minutes and the lead up to the Iraq war.

On August 11, Conyers wrote to the Office of Counsel to the President as follows:

"On June 30, 2005, I and 51 other Members of Congress requested access to 'all agency records, including but not limited to handwritten notes, formal correspondence, electronic mail messages, intelligence reports and other memoranda,' as described in five enumerated paragraphs. A copy of the request letter is enclosed.

"The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires your office to respond to a FOIA request within twenty business days from the date of receipt of such a request. See 5 U.S.C. S 552(a)(6)(A)(i). The deadline has now elapsed without any response from your office. Because the leaked memoranda from Great Britain raise serious questions over when important war-related decisions were made, time is of the essence.

"I and the other Members of Congress do not wish to resort to litigation because, at this point, a cooperative approach is better suited to resolving the situation. I am available to assist your office in any way possible to facilitate the prompt release of the requested documents. If you need clarification of the request or have any questions, please contact Stacey Dansky of the House Judiciary staff at 202-225-6906."

The State Department phoned the Judiciary Committee Democratic staff on September 2 asking for a clarification letter, which the Judiciary staff sent on September 19. This letter limited the original request in some significant ways, as requested by the State Department, including limiting the time period from which certain information was sought, limiting some of the documents requested to those originating from the public affairs department, and eliminating some requests entirely.

On September 27, the State Department sent back a brief note stating that the request was being processed.

That was months ago, and the State Department has since told the Judiciary staff, in response to various phone inquiries, only that the request is still being processed.

The White House, meanwhile, has never even acknowledged the FOIA request.

The Department of Defense phoned the Judiciary staff on July 15 asking for a clarification letter, which was sent on July 28. The July 28 letter clarified various points and limited the request in response to comments from the Department of Defense.

It then took until November 30 for the Department of Defense to send another letter to the House Judiciary Democratic staff. This new letter--addressed from Will Kramer, Chief, Office of Freedom of Information, Department of Defense, to the Honorable John Conyers, Jr.--said that the request would take a considerable time to process. In fact, it said processing of the request would not even begin until Conyers sent the DOD a statement of willingness to pay applicable fees, which the Department estimated as $110,000, not including reproduction charges.

Conyers has introduced bills to censure President Bush and Vice President Cheney for their refusals to respond to requests for information (see www.censurebush.org).*


Would God forgive Bush?

At an anti-war rally in Scotland, John Mann, a priest, spoke about how a young person recently asked him out of the blue whether he thought God would forgive George Bush. Mann said he responded that it was a good question. He told me that what struck him was that decades ago that same question was always asked about Hitler.

David Swanson


The Washington Free Press
PMB #178, 1463 E Republican ST, Seattle WA 98112
wafreepress@gmail.com

Donate free food
Google
Search the Free Press archive:

WWW
Washington Free Press
Home |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory