#69 May/June 2004
The Washington Free Press Washington's Independent Journal of News, Ideas & Culture
Home  |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory 

FIRST WORDS

READER MAIL
No beer with Bush, etc.

NORTHWEST & BEYOND
Instant Runoff Voting Initiative, Labor victory at Powell's, etc
compiled by Paul Schafer

POLITICS

Opening Our Electoral Process
by John B. Anderson

Fair Presidential Election: How?
Washington, like Florida, to be a "battleground state"
by Steven Hill and Rob Richie

White House Engaged in Misinformation Campaign
from the ACLU

The Anti-Empire Report #9
The Israeli lobby, Guinea Pigs Fighting for Freedom, etc.
by William Blum

MEDIA

Media Beat
How the Newshour Changed History, The Quest for a Monopoly on Violence
by Norman Solomon

LAW

Grant County's Shameful Public Defense System
from the ACLU of Washington

Legal News
from the ACLU of Washington

HEALTH

Questioning Vaccines in the Hospital
Vaccination Decisions--part 4:
opinion by Doug Collins

Pierce County Dentist Speaks Out Against Fluoridation
opinion by Dr. Debra Hopkins

Researchers Caution: Avoid Feeding Babies Fluoridated Water
from New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation

Water Protection Petition

ENVIRONMENT

Toward A Toxic-Free Future:

EPA Using Industry Insiders to Forge Pesticide Policy
Conservation groups file lawsuit to stop it
by Erika Schreder, WTC

State Amends Incinerator Rule
But the dirty, obsolete practice of Incineration continues
by Brandie Smith, WTC

Hanford Initiative Likely on November Ballot
by Gregg Small, WTC

Calculating Disaster: Accidents at Puget Sound's Trident installation cast doubt on Navy and Lockheed safety claims
by Glen Milner

The Big Drip: Glacier National Park's Glaciers disappearing
summary by Paul Schafer

ACTIVISM

Health Care: A Right, Not A Commodity
opinion by Brian King

Protest Against Medical Redefinition Of "Woman"
March Against Unwarranted, Unconsented, Unwanted Operations
from Hysterectomy Educational Resources and Services (HERS)

The Death of Humanism
opinion by John Merriam

CULTURE

QUOTE: Generation Gap
from Jean Liedloff's The Continuum Concept

The Fact is...
by Styx Mundstock

Candy Island Invades the Vegetable Kingdom
cartoon and text by Leonard Rifas

What's your library doing on September 11?
by Rodger Herbst

The Consequences of Ads
by Doug Collins

BOOKS: Gates of Injustice: The Crisis in America's Prisons
by Alan Elsner

GOOD IDEAS FROM DIFFERENT COUNTRIES:
Europe Leaves the US Behind:
The key to national prosperity is "Fulcrum Institutions"?
by Steven Hill

Questioning Vaccines in the Hospital

opinion by Doug Collins

Numbered references appear at the end of this article. Health information in the WA Free Press should not be construed as medical advice. Always make your own choice regarding medical treatment by seeking multiple sources of information and consulting with your personal physician.

Throughout the past hundred years, many capitalists, communists, and other followers of aggressive ideologies have employed technology in a combative, military manner, a manner which has not been limited to the battlefield. This has resulted in rapid development of chemical, nuclear, and bioscience applications, which for decades have proceeded with hardly a limit, touching every corner of our industrialized lives. Mega-weapons were created to "wipe-out" the enemy. Similarly, in the home, chemical cleaners became the modern agents to "fight" or "kill" dirt and germs. In the hospital, mass-vaccination became the biotech tool to "eradicate" diseases.

But our culture is currently undergoing a shift, in which many people are discovering that natural dirt and germs aren't all bad, and that synthetic chemicals aren't all good. Such simple practices as using baking soda to clean your counter, rather than chemically disinfectant scouring powder, is a simple example of how many people are attempting to lead their lives in less conflict with nature.

Scores of well-publicized scientific studies have recently shown that our commercially-induced fear of germs has worked to our disadvantage. These studies have shown that humans have a natural beneficial relationship with many bacteria and viruses (1). Antibacterial soaps, household chemicals, and spotless homes can disrupt our natural relationship with germs, resulting in less-than-optimum health, such as a higher chance of allergies and asthma.

Similarly, many scientific studies have also pointed to serious health concerns with mass-vaccination policies, as well as possible immune benefits of contracting traditional childhood diseases such as measles (2). But if you ask a typical MD about vaccinations, he/she will usually tell you to consult information from the federal Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which is a bit like the pope in the priesthood of American medicine. What most MDs don't know--and therefore can't tell you--is that the majority of members on the CDC's vaccine advisory board, the people who determine the vaccine policies, have received pay from the large pharmaceutical companies which manufacture vaccines, and that officially sanctioned research on vaccine safety is funded by the same companies (3). This conflict of interest has created lax safety standards that make it impossible to compare the risks and benefits of vaccinations (4).

Few family-practice doctors personally research the risks and benefits of vaccines past the tainted recommendations of the CDC, and of those who do, few are willing to take a questioning public stance.

Mass-vaccination has become the dogma of institutional medicine, and non-conformists in any occupation can risk losing their jobs. Despite these barriers, there are some mainstream MDs, such as Dr. Harold Buttram, who have become outspoken critics of vaccination policy, as well as many notable Osteopathic medical doctors, such as Drs. Joseph Mercola, Randall Neustaedter, and Sherri Tenpenny.

Although your personal doctor is not likely to be very informed about the large body of research evidence that points to concern over vaccination, there is no reason that you can't be. In a couple months of spare-time independent study, you can probably become better informed than most MDs about the the large body of research on the risks of vaccines (5). In fact, doing so is an essential part of the traditional ethics of medicine: namely, "informed consent", the idea that patients should be fully informed about a treatment and its risks before they consent to take it.

Until a couple years ago, I had personally never even thought about questioning vaccinations, and never saw a need to inform myself about them. I always just got shots whenever the doctor said I should. But recently, as a new parent, I was a bit concerned that the nurse wanted to give my baby a hepatitis B shot only hours after his birth. "No," I said, "We've got to learn more about this first." After reading the hospital's list of vaccinations, I became even more concerned. There are many more vaccines now than when I was a child (this is not necessarily obvious, because nowadays multiple vaccines are usually combined into a single injection).

Initially, my gut feeling was that giving a child seven vaccines at two months of age was a mighty strange thing to do. After months of researching more about the diseases and vaccines, from official sources such as the CDC (www.cdc.gov), independent sources such as the National Vaccine Information Center (www.909shot.com), and manufacturer safety data sheets for the vaccines, I saw that my gut feeling had merit. There is a great deal that is questionable about our public health policies of mass-vaccination and about the safety of the vaccinations themselves.

My feeling was sadly bolstered by a conversation at a party, where I met the father of a three-month old. I asked him what vaccinations his baby had gotten. "We got the full two-month set of shots," he said, "and our baby hasn't been the same since." He complained that his daughter lost responsiveness and energy immediately following the shots, and hadn't regained it. As Barbara Loe Fisher, a founder of the National Vaccine Information Center points out, most doctors do not report such symptoms to the CDC, and therefore such side-effects are under-represented in statistics.

Dealing with my own baby's pediatrician and hospital was a bit shocking. When I told the pediatrician about my reluctance to vaccinate my child, he said, "Have you been reading vaccination criticism on the internet? Let me tell you, their stuff is full of lies." I was taken aback. Why, after all, would anyone have a motive to lie in criticizing vaccinations? On the other hand, there is obviously a huge financial motive on the part of pharmaceutical companies to promote profitable mass-vaccinations.

When I asked the nurses at the hospital immunization clinic for copies of the manufacturer data sheets on the immunizations, one of them took me aside and said, "You know, we get some parents in here that only want to give their child one shot at a time. That's really bad for the child because then the child cries every time they come here, and then it's hard to give them the shot. It's really better just to give all the shots at once." I didn't argue, but just smiled. The nurse was simply thinking about what was easier for her and the child in the short term, rather than what might be ultimately healthier for the child.

The next time I took my baby to the pediatrician, he asked me to sign a refusal form stating that I did not wish to have vaccinations for my baby. The form had some fine print, so I said I'd take it home and read it. I'm glad I did, because the form would have granted my HMO the right to waive my health coverage if my child caught one of the diseases (see illustration). In other words, if I signed the form, and if--for example--my child later needed any treatment for rare side-effects of measles, I might have to self-pay all the costs of his care. That would be extremely unfair, as any of the many documented side-effects of vaccinations would be covered without question under the health plan. The lesson here is: don't sign any such affidavits. You don't have to, and you're probably only signing away your insurance rights if you do.

My pediatrician now doesn't bother me much about vaccinations, except in a good-natured way. After having a couple informed arguments about the issue, it seems we now have a mutual respect for each other's stances. I know now that vaccinations are not themselves the main problem; the main problem is a governmental regulatory system that is influenced by business interests. I think my pediatrician now realizes that people have rational concerns about this system.

I can achieve this mutual respect with my pediatrician only because in Washington State we are fairly lucky that parents have a choice over whether or not to vaccinate children, and that schools must admit nonvaccinated children by granting waivers to parents who are opposed to vaccinations. In some other states with draconian vaccination laws, doctors have been known to report parents to the police for neglect if the parents refuse vaccination. Don't be surprised if, in the future, some medical/pharmaceutical lobbyists attempt to pass the same sort of laws here.

References

(1) "Hygiene Hypothesis Gains Support in the United States and Europe", Timothy Begany, Respiratory Reviews, January 2003, www.respiratoryreviews.com/jan03/rr_jan03_hygiene.html

(2) For a brief overview of many scientific studies showing negative public health consequences of vaccination, see two articles by Dr Harold Buttram, MD published in the Washington Free Press: "Vaccines: Think Again" Nov 2002, and "Haphazard Health" Jan 2003 .

(3) "The Vaccine Conflict" by Mark Benjamin, United Press International investigation published in Washington Free Press, Jan 2004,

(4) "Vaccination Decisions--part one: Is it possible to assess vaccine safety?" by Doug Collins, Washington Free Press, Sept 2003.

(5) One excellent resource containing comprehensive references to medical studies and alternatives to vaccination is the book The Vaccine Guide by Dr. Randall Neustaedter.


The Washington Free Press
PMB #178, 1463 E Republican ST, Seattle WA 98112
WAfreepress@gmail.com

Donate free food
Google
Search the Free Press archive:

WWW
Washington Free Press
Home |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory