#69 May/June 2004
The Washington Free Press Washington's Independent Journal of News, Ideas & Culture
Home  |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory 

FIRST WORDS

READER MAIL
No beer with Bush, etc.

NORTHWEST & BEYOND
Instant Runoff Voting Initiative, Labor victory at Powell's, etc
compiled by Paul Schafer

POLITICS

Opening Our Electoral Process
by John B. Anderson

Fair Presidential Election: How?
Washington, like Florida, to be a "battleground state"
by Steven Hill and Rob Richie

White House Engaged in Misinformation Campaign
from the ACLU

The Anti-Empire Report #9
The Israeli lobby, Guinea Pigs Fighting for Freedom, etc.
by William Blum

MEDIA

Media Beat
How the Newshour Changed History, The Quest for a Monopoly on Violence
by Norman Solomon

LAW

Grant County's Shameful Public Defense System
from the ACLU of Washington

Legal News
from the ACLU of Washington

HEALTH

Questioning Vaccines in the Hospital
Vaccination Decisions--part 4:
opinion by Doug Collins

Pierce County Dentist Speaks Out Against Fluoridation
opinion by Dr. Debra Hopkins

Researchers Caution: Avoid Feeding Babies Fluoridated Water
from New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation

Water Protection Petition

ENVIRONMENT

Toward A Toxic-Free Future:

EPA Using Industry Insiders to Forge Pesticide Policy
Conservation groups file lawsuit to stop it
by Erika Schreder, WTC

State Amends Incinerator Rule
But the dirty, obsolete practice of Incineration continues
by Brandie Smith, WTC

Hanford Initiative Likely on November Ballot
by Gregg Small, WTC

Calculating Disaster: Accidents at Puget Sound's Trident installation cast doubt on Navy and Lockheed safety claims
by Glen Milner

The Big Drip: Glacier National Park's Glaciers disappearing
summary by Paul Schafer

ACTIVISM

Health Care: A Right, Not A Commodity
opinion by Brian King

Protest Against Medical Redefinition Of "Woman"
March Against Unwarranted, Unconsented, Unwanted Operations
from Hysterectomy Educational Resources and Services (HERS)

The Death of Humanism
opinion by John Merriam

CULTURE

QUOTE: Generation Gap
from Jean Liedloff's The Continuum Concept

The Fact is...
by Styx Mundstock

Candy Island Invades the Vegetable Kingdom
cartoon and text by Leonard Rifas

What's your library doing on September 11?
by Rodger Herbst

The Consequences of Ads
by Doug Collins

BOOKS: Gates of Injustice: The Crisis in America's Prisons
by Alan Elsner

GOOD IDEAS FROM DIFFERENT COUNTRIES:
Europe Leaves the US Behind:
The key to national prosperity is "Fulcrum Institutions"?
by Steven Hill

Researchers Caution: Avoid Feeding Babies Fluoridated Water

from New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation

Numbered references appear at the end of this article.

Infant formulas prepared with fluoridated water increase dental fluorosis risk, according to the April 2004 Journal of the American College of Nutrition and other studies. To prevent this tooth staining, researchers caution against mixing infant formulas with fluoridated water. Fluorosis, white-spotted, yellow or brown stained, sometimes pitted or crumbly teeth, is the too-late warning sign that babies have overdosed on fluoride. Researchers Marshall and colleagues found more fluorosed teeth in children who consumed the most fluoridated water, either straight water alone or through infant formulas.(1)

Researchers Brothwell and Limeback urge breastfeeding or mixing infant formula with non-fluoridated water to avoid dental fluorosis. In a November 2003 Journal of Human Lactation study they found three times more fluorosis in children consuming 1 milligram per liter fluoridated water compared to those who drank non-fluoridated water.(2)

Breastfeeding does not increase cavity risk, according to a recent Journal of the American Dental Association study.(3)

Researcher Mascarenhas also advised parents to avoid fluoridated water for infant formula preparation to prevent fluorosis in a 2000 Pediatric Dentistry study.(4)

At least eleven other studies link reconstituted formula with fluorosis.(5a-k) This gives dentistry a new income source--concealing fluoride-induced discolored teeth.(6)

"To our knowledge, no US dental or governmental agency promoting fluoridation as a cavity preventive, such as the American Dental Association or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), warns parents to avoid fluoridated water for infant feeding. Why not?" asks lawyer Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. Formula prepared with fluoridated water provides 100 times more fluoride than the amount in breast milk.(7) And newborns do not have fully developed kidneys for handling the fluoride at this early stage of life.(8) This can lead to dangerous fluoride build-up in bones.(9) Not only is infant fluoride intake risky, it's unnecessary. According to the CDC, "Fluoride works primarily after teeth have erupted."(10)

The US Food and Drug Administration has never safety-tested fluoride for ingestion.(11) In 2000, after extensively reviewing fluoride and health studies, a panel of British scientists report, "We were unable to discover any reliable good-quality evidence [about dental benefits of fluoridated water] in the fluoridation literature world-wide."(12) This despite incorrect news reports disseminated by prominent fluoride proponents about this review.(13)

For more information, contact nyscof@aol.com, tinyurl.com/ad9k, www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof.

References:

1) "Associations between Intakes of Fluoride from Beverages during Infancy and Dental Fluorosis of Primary Teeth,"

2) "Breastfeeding is protective against dental fluorosis in a nonfluoridated rural area of Ontario, Canada"

3) "The relationship between healthful eating practices and dental caries in children aged 2-5 years in the United States, 1988-1994"

4) "Risk factors for dental fluorosis: a review of the recent literature"

5a) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list_uids=10860326 b) same as 5a but with =10343089 at the end c) similarly, with =9829868 d) =8639113 e) =7776294 f) =2589311 g) =3198847 h) =12925822 i) =11324405 j) =11109209 k) http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2004Hawaii/techprogram/abstract_40477.htm

6) "Using microabrasive material to remove fluorosis stains"

7) The Ecologist, 1986, Volume 16 "Fluoride: New Grounds for Concern," By Mark Diesendorf and Philip R.N. Sutton

8) Caries Research 1984 "Fluoride Balance Studies on Infants in a 1-ppm-water-fluoride area" by Ekstrand J, Hardell LI, SpakCJ

9) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, "Public Health Statement for Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluorine"

10) US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

11) Suite 101 - Fluoridation - includes e-mail correspondence between Suite 101 author and the FDA "Fluoride - Not FDA Approved for Ingestion," March 21, 2004

12) "What the 'York Review' on the fluoridation of drinking water really found," 28 October 2003, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK

13) National Center for Fluoridation Policy & Research and Oral Health America's Center for Fluoridation, Michael W. Easley, D.D.S., M.P.H.; Director


The Washington Free Press
PMB #178, 1463 E Republican ST, Seattle WA 98112
WAfreepress@gmail.com

Donate free food
Google
Search the Free Press archive:

WWW
Washington Free Press
Home |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory