Send your letters to the WA Free Press, PMB #178, 1463 E Republican
St,
Seattle 98112, or WAfreepress@gmail.com. Please include your full name
and phone number for verification. Keep them short. Letters may be
edited for length, spelling and grammar. Letters printed do not
necessarily reflect the opinion of the Free Press. Letters which respond
to Free Press articles will be given precedence.
No beer with Bush
Well, maybe I've been guilty of underrating President Bush. It seems
that, despite his many attacks on American values, he's still judged by
white male Americans as being a strong and a pleasant fellow they'd like
to have a few beers with. Maybe I've been missing something?
Never mind the tax cuts engineered by Bush and his cronies to reward his
rich campaign contributors. Just because Bush is out of touch with poor
and middle class Americans doesn't mean he doesn't care. It just means
that his caring is directly related to the amount of money given to his
campaigns.
And never mind the matter of corporate fraud. We're not talking about
small change here. Trillions of dollars robbed from corporate employee
pension plans and from Uncle Sam through tax fraud. I imagine that
what's hit the corporate media (Enron, et al) is just the tip of the
iceberg. Noteworthy are the thousands of offshore corporations and tax
shelters set up expressly to rob and steal. But hey, our boy George
stands foursquare behind deregulation, allowing more of the same.
Finally, there's George's heroic wartime exploits in the Texas National
Guard. Seems like there aren't enough neocon flunkies to spin that one.
It's ironic (or worse) to see hundreds of our young people killed and
billions of our tax dollars spent on a war started by one who's never
seen combat.
Do I think he's a strong and pleasant guy that I'd like to have a beer
with? Not likely.
Howard Pellett
What about environment?
It's not surprising President Bush said not a word about the environment
during his State of the Union speech in January. After all, he's
supported widespread logging, drilling, mining... and that's just for a
start. He's declared war on the environment, but it's a silent war.
What was extremely disturbing was that neither National Public Radio
commentators or Democratic leaders said anything about the environment
either.
Senator Tom Daschle and Representative Nancy Pelosi, in the Democratic
rebuttal, were far more concerned with questions of national security
and economy than of the environment.
What about us? Senator Daschle asked about small-town residents who want
more jobs. I would ask that same question about dozens of species facing
habitat destruction and genocide. The Bush administration's refusal to
allocate anywhere near enough money to environmental agencies,
particularly the Fish and Wildlife Service, is crippling their ability
to defend animals on the endangered species list, if those species even
make it onto the list at all.
Daschle also talked about the need for every child to go to a good
school. But what about the need of every child to breathe? Asthma in
children is reaching epidemic proportions, thanks in no small part to
the EPA's retraction of "new source review." Now, according to a study
by ABT Associates, the 51 coal-fired power plants that were in process
of being prosecuted under new source review--and have now been entirely
let off the hook--kill 5,000 to 9,000 people and cause hundreds of
thousands of asthma attacks every year.
Everyone--President Bush, the Democratic candidates and the
commentators--talked about what the American people want. And of course,
we do want lower taxes and better health care and education and more
jobs and freedom from fear. But we also want a clean environment.
It's about time we let our government know that. We need to call our
leaders, or write, or email, and demand that they fight the war for the
environment as well as the war on terror.
Laurel Eddy
|