#76 July/August 2005
The Washington Free Press Washington's Independent Journal of News, Ideas & Culture
Home  |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer 

TOP STORIES

Wake-up Call: Can radiation from cell phones damage DNA in our brains? When a UW researcher found disturbing data, funding became tight
by Rob Harrill, reprinted with permission from Columns magazine

Welcome Seafair?: Military recruitment is at the heart of the Seattle summer festival
by Glen Milner

Mined Over Maury: A nice island is getting hauled away, bit by bit
by Hannah Lee

FREE THOUGHTS

How to Have Clean and Complete Voter Rolls
by Rob Richie and Steven Hill

MEDIA BEAT by Norman Solomon
From Watergate to Downing Street

READER MAIL
Police State at US/Canada Border; Everybody Lost in Last Years' Vote

NORTHWEST & BEYOND news shorts compiled by Sharlynn Cobaugh Warm Winter Leaves Columbia Basin Dry; Oregonian's Stop-Loss Battle Lost; Summer Sun and Skin Cancer; CA Nurses Take On Schwarzenegger; Harvard Takes Action Against Genocide in Sudan

MONEY

Searching for Tax Fairness
Lack of regulation on capital-gains tax invites non-compliance
by Gerald E. Scorse

Consumers Overlook Opt-Out: contacts for stopping unwanted credit card solicitations
by Tim Covell

ENVIRONMENT

DOT Bans Stealth Radioactive Shipments
Recent ruling against secret shipments of uranium munitions by the Department of Defense
by Glen Milner

TRASH TALK by Dave and Lillian Brummet
Clean Vacationing: Garbage in its Place

Software Reduces Computer-related CO2 Emissions
press release from Userful

DUSEL Not Welcomed in Leavenworth
by Sharlynn Cobaugh

George W. Bush: EnvironWent
cartoon by George Jartos

WORKPLACE

Legislation Can Reduce Store Homicides
by Kenneth Wayne Yarbrough

Farmworkers Boycott Gallo Wines photo and caption by David Bacon

HEALTH

Cellular Antennas
Facts about the technology and related policies
by Tamara Dyer

NATURE DOC by John F. Ruhland, ND
Cell Phone; Naturopathic IVs

CELL PHONES DAMAGE SPERM
by Doug Collins

Fluoride Damages Bones, Studies Show
from New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation

LAW

Scores of Muslim Men Jailed Without Charge
from the ACLU

BOB'S RANDOM LEGAL WISDOM by Bob Anderton
It's OK to Help: The good samaritan rule

CONTACTS/ACTIVISM

NORTHWEST NEIGHBORS
contact list of subscribers who like to talk with you

DO SOMETHING! CALENDAR
Northwest activist events

POLITICS

Red Meat for the Red States: Democrats don't stand a chance unless they choose more meaningful issues
by Brian King

Mexicans Want Democracy, But More
by David Bacon

WAR & PEACE

Poems for Peace
compiled by Stan Penner

Great Seal of the United States: The Bush revisions
cartoon by Andrew Wahl

MISCELLANEOUS

Just because...
by Styx Mundstock

The Danger of Being Tongue-Tied
The US still lags in multilingualism
by Domenico Maceri

The Wanderings and Thoughts of Kip Kellogg
by Vincent Spada

The Danger of Being Tongue-Tied

by Domenico Maceri

"Tomorrow is zero hour" and "The match is about to begin" were two Al Quaeda messages sent on September 10, 2001. The messages were intercepted by The National Security Agency but were translated after the tragedy of 9/11.

Of course, these were not the only "dots" governmental officials were unable to connect in the fight against terrorism. Yet, they reflect the importance of information and the critical need for language skills to access it and make us secure.

Although we have spent billions to fight terrorism, not enough resources have been put in intelligence. And that means the ability to have enough personnel who understand the languages used by terrorists.

To be sure, some efforts have been made. The FBI has 1,214 linguists now, up from 883 in 2001. Many of the increases are in the critical languages of Arabic and Farsi.

Yet, the government collects plenty of data which goes untranslated. In some cases, no one looks at it simply because of storage limitations. According to governmental policies, data related to Al Quaeda is supposed to be reviewed within 12 hours of interception. That is often not done, according to the inspector general.

The problem is serious and is compounded by the fact that Americans have serious misconceptions about the value of languages in the world.

Fundamentally, Americans suffer from monolingualism. You see it in education. While foreign languages are a basic subject in many industrialized nations, in the US foreign languages are considered a frill. Indeed, it is possible to graduate from an American college without being able to communicate in a language other than English.

Although the US is arguably the most powerful country in the world, our educational system is ethnocentric. In spite of our political, economic, and also military connections with many countries around the world, we view things from an English-speaking window.

To a certain extent, this can be justified by the importance of the English language in the world. It is possible to do well economically without knowing a second language.

One can travel and enjoy the sights with just English. But to really understand people around the world you need to be able to know their language.

Languages also mean an understanding of foreign cultures because they involve much more than just a way to communicate. Languages reflect history and how people see the world around them. By letting others learn our language and not learning theirs, we end up in a weak position. We only see a part of the picture.

What's amazing is that many people keep insisting on English only. Twenty-seven American states have passed laws declaring English their official language. It sounds innocuous enough, but these laws reflect misguided notions about languages. The message is that immigrants should expect no services from government except in English.

Unfortunately, these laws also send a message to Americans. English alone is enough. Just like you need not make any effort to understand new immigrants and their language, you need not learn other languages spoken around the world.

These laws reflect a fear of languages and create a dangerous environment which forces us to bury our head in the sand. We don't want to know things unless they are available in English. Until it's too late. Then we struggle and we can't find enough people who understand the terrorists' words.

If we can't understand the terrorists' words, we have no chance of understanding their motivation as to why they want to hurt us. We don't understand why some people would give their lives and die in a suicide mission. We simply dismiss them as crazy. But there is more to the story. To unlock the story, we need a key which is not available in the English-only philosophy. The English-only philosophy represents a danger to our security.

Domenico Maceri (http://languageblogger.blogspot.com/), PhD, UC Santa Barbara, teaches foreign languages at Allan Hancock College in Santa Maria, CA. His articles have appeared in many newspapers and some have won awards from the National Association of Hispanic Publications.


The Washington Free Press
PMB #178, 1463 E Republican ST, Seattle WA 98112
[WAfreepress@gmail.com] WAfreepress@gmail.com

Donate free food
Google
Search the Free Press archive:

WWW
Washington Free Press
Home |  Subscribe |  Back Issues |  The Organization |  Volunteer |  Do Something Directory