Opinions expressed in this section are those of Free Press readers.
Send your opinions to WAfreepress@gmail.com
or snail mail them to 1463 E. Republican #178, Seattle 98102
Longer letters will be edited down.
Workers Are Without a Voice
Regarding "Boeing Jobs Take Flight for Profit" WFP #24, (Nov/Dec '96): Rather than portray Boeing executives as businessmen moved by the same economic imperative as Andrew Carnegie-to reduce costs as the only way to survive in the jungle of competition-the boys from Boeing are painted as poor peddlers unable to sell airplanes without selling out workers. The airplane sale to China was used by the Bosses at Boeing to justify what economic imperative required-the movement of $3000-5000 a month jobs to low wage countries like China where workers are enslaved at $50 a month.
Donald Barlett and James Steele of the Philadelphia Inquirer bought the Boeing public relations hyperbole about the provision of jobs in foreign lands being required to sell airplanes. What choices did the Chinese have? Without a system of roads to integrate the Empire, China's leaders will be forced to use airplanes in massive amounts if a growth rate of over ten percent is to be maintained.
In fact, China will need so many airplanes that she will be required to buy from both of the world's largest airplane suppliers-Boeing and Airbus-regardless of the deals offered. Is Boeing threatened by the possibility of moving jobs to a country where wages are for slaves? As Europeans, we can assure you that there would be another revolution in France before the European Community and the Euro Unions would allow Airbus jobs to disappear. The elimination of 50,000 well-organized American union workers from the forces of countervailing power was also, no doubt, seen as a worthy goal and a great benefit to business. The destruction of unions allows labor costs to be driven down to subsistence levels.
In short, workers in America are without a voice. Unions own no large daily newspapers in any city in America. One would think the Machinists would own a newspaper in Seattle and other concentrations of union membership - to present the workers' point of view to the world while preaching to the converted at home.
Why isn't a portion of union membership dues devoted to buying or starting newspapers and television stations to counter management propaganda? Why aren't some of the former 50,000 Boeing union employees hired by union newspapers and television production companies? Why aren't union membership dues used to establish political parties devoted to job and work-related issues?