BUSH LOST
by Margie
Burns
As things stand right now, it seems unlikely that Mr. Bush won
the election.
There are two major categories of problems. One affects the
electoral vote.
Release of the final exit polls conducted in all states shows a
pattern that
cannot be explained away (
www.scoop.co.nz/
mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm).
The
exit polls were released (not to the
general public) at 4pm on Election Day by
polling consultants Edison Media
Research and Mitofsky International.
These are the genuine exit polls
for all 50 states and the District of
Columbia, taken before the outcome was
known in any particular state. These are
not the "exit polls" that organizations
including CNN went back and
retroactively changed after the election, making
them conform more to vote
tallies.
The exit poll results are laid out
straightforwardly in a very clear list
(tabulation). Compared to the vote
tallies given the public, they seem amazing.
Contrary to results in every
election for the past twenty years, the variance
between exit polls and the
published vote tally was more than two points, in
other words a swing of 4% or
5% or more to Bush, in 33 of 51 jurisdictions.
Regardless of which candidate won
in those states, a big variance, always in the
same direction, allegedly
occurred in every single exit poll in all of them.
Exit polls from the
next nine states down the list were also reversed by a
smaller swing toward Bush
in the published vote tally, including in the District
of Columbia and Maryland.
Thus, to sum up, a four-out-five-state swing to Bush
is alleged in an election
where every indication showed new voters, independent
voters, and younger voters
trending toward Kerry and/or away from Bush, and in
an election where turnout
increased, even though increased voter turnout
generally favors the challenger
against the incumbent.
Furthermore, this crucial swing occurred in all
the close states: Colorado,
Florida, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and
Iowa all allegedly had the same "red shift." Most
results shifted more than two
points, in other words a swing of 4% or 5%,
regardless of the size or region of
the state, or whether it went for Bush or
Kerry.
A paper titled "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy" has been
published by Dr.
Steven F. Freeman, a professor at the University of
Pennsylvania and at an
international MBA program founded by Harvard. According
to Professor Freeman,
the swing between exit poll and vote tally is an anomaly
even if you take just
the key battleground states of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and
Florida. "The likelihood
of any two of these statistical anomalies occurring
together is on the order of
one-in-a-million. The odds against all three
occurring together are 250 million
to one." (
www.truthout.org/docs_04/
111404A.shtml)
A brief personal disclaimer: I distrust opinion
polls and much other polling. I
have long worried that incessant polling can
weaken the individual's reliance on
his/her own judgment, can plant suggestions,
can intimidate reporters, and can
manipulate public acceptance of the
unacceptable. Following this election, an
opinion poll has already been
published suggesting that most people are relieved
that the outcome was clear.
All well and good, if it was clear. But the integrity of counting
votes is
essential to our nation's survival as a democracy. Obsession about who
is ahead
before the election is often silly. But after the election, the
question of who
won is fundamental. No other question is nearly as important.
Exit polls are not just polls. They are polls of people who actually
showed up
to vote, taken just after the voting, and weighted to take into
account any
preponderance of one group. Professor Freeman's paper points out
that exit polls
are used to check and verify the validity of elections in
countries including
Germany and Mexico; when exit polls contradicted the claim
that Eduard
Shevardnadze had won election in the former Soviet country of
Georgia, he was
forced to resign under pressure from the US among
others.
Immediate investigation is most urgent in four states: Ohio,
Florida, New
Mexico, and Iowa. The many problems already reported from counties
and precincts
in all these four states more than corroborate the suggestion
raised by the exit
poll tabulation. These four states also add up to 59
electoral votes, far more
than enough to have tilted the election
outcome.
The Electoral College is not the whole story. Questions have
arisen that affect
the popular vote count even in "safe" states. Stay
tuned.
Margie Burns is a freelance writer in Maryland. She can be
reached at
margie.burns@verizon.net .
|