Regulars
Reader Mail
Envirowatch
Urban Work
MediaBeat
Reel Underground
Features
Goodbye Glaciers Hello Wildfires
Richest Nations Urged to Create Green Taxes
‘Drill, Dig, Destroy and Pollute’
Enviros Blast Bush ‘Conservation’ Measures
Are You Kyoto Compliant?
Take the following quiz and see if you meet international standards for fighting global warming.
UN: Poor will Suffer the most
The poorest and least adaptable parts of the world will suffer most from climate change over the next 100 years, according to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
US Coastal Areas Most Threatened by Climate Change
by Cat Lazaroff
Europe Tests WTO on Caged Hen Rules
Gary Condit, Feminist Icon & Maria Cantwell, President?
by Mike Seely, contributor
Amnesty needed
Bush “Guest Worker” Program a Trojan Horse to Bust Labor
by David Bacon, contributor
Why People Hate Lawyers
fiction by John Merriam, contributor and attorney-at-law
Pesticide Potpourri
Mercury in your Mouth
“Silver” dental fillings are increasingly recognized as a health risk
by Christine Johnson
Widespread Toxic Exposure
The CDC says there are too many chemicals in our bodies
By Cat Lazaroff, Environment News Service
Bush: Empty Palabras?
opinion by Domenico Maceri, contributor
Periodical Praise
Nudie-phobes should stop badgering librarians
opinion by Jim Sullivan, contributor
Take Aim At Bad Ads
by Linda Formichelli, contributor
Democracy on a Rear Bumper
by Glenn Reed, contributor
Political Pix
Fast Food Not Fast Enough: Take Time Out for Dinner
opinion by Jim Matorin, contributor
Slow Food Catching on Fast
Texecutioner
Is Bush shooting for the world execution record?
opinion by Sean Carter
|
|
|
Gary Condit, Feminist Icon & Maria Cantwell, President?
by Mike Seely, contributor
One piece of propoganda that struck me as most corny during my
brief yet poignant experience as Maria Cantwell’s deputy press
secretary during Campaign 2000 was an Al Gore poster featuring the
following quote from “Tron” himself:
“We have only begun to work for working families.”
It was not long after that I learned that a research guru of ours was
in on the crafting of this buzzword while on staff in the Clinton
White House. Much as I loved the guy, I wanted to wring his neck for
having a hand in that cheesy round of wordsmithing, as it irrevocably
turned up the volume on the role of family in American politics.
Thanks to Gary Condit and his tacky travails, perhaps now we can turn
it down. Frankly, the voting public must shoulder at least partial
blame for the sexual forays of the Condits, Clintons and Kennedys of
the world. For too long, we have virtually demanded a walk down the
aisle and 2.4 kids from those who represent us in D.C., a ridiculous
expectation of a personality type that has proven to lack anything
resembling predisposition toward monogamy. And because such
philandering is so overwhelmingly a male problem, Condit may well
prove to be the most compelling argument to date for the election of
the first woman President.
First off, let’s look at the nature of the beast. Elected public
servants who are truly committed to their profession willfully allow
their lives to be dominated by 7 a.m. briefings and midnight war-room
sessions over stale beer, conditions which are hardly conducive to
family life.
Furthermore, supporters and staffers inevitably place gutsy, macho
pols on a pedestal, creating an environment ripe for sexual
manipulation. Couple this with the timetested theory that the more
time you spend with a person, the more attracted you are to them, and
you get Clinton-Lewinsky or Condit-Levy.
To illustrate the second layer of this philandering-to-feminism
theory, while Lewinsky’s physical shortcomings were trumpeted to a
cruel extent from the media mountaintops, shockingly glowing
descriptions of Levy’s looks should strike the average heterosexual
male as blatantly inaccurate. “Raven-haired beauty?” Come on. Neither
Clinton nor Condit was painstakingly seduced by a luscious Hollywood
actress, but both were rather easily seduced by gals who’d fit right
in with the Bridge and Tunnel crowd.
Conversely, accounts of women in Congress so easily cheating on their
husbands are few and far between, which would appear to make them
better suited to tend to the work of their constituents, unfettered by
the fleshy foibles that plague the blokes.
But perhaps the perfect political beast is the single pol, a real-life
version of Michael Douglas’ American President. Or, better yet,
a single female, someone along the lines of the already real-life
Senator Cantwell, a policy-obsessed wonk who has never been wed.
Of course, for such perfect political robots to emerge, the voting
public must give up its poll-tested desire for the Rockwellian
politician/family man. If we’re unwilling to do that, we deserve all
the Condits we can handle without making an ethically germane
peep.
Formerly Senator Maria Cantwell’s Deputy Campaign Press Secretary,
Mike Seely is a Seattle-based writer whose work has appeared regularly
in The Stranger, Seattle Weekly and Seattle Magazine,
among other publications.
|