ENVIROWATCH

HOW HUMANS TREAT
THEIR SURROUNDINGS,
EACH OTHER, THEMSELVES





Does Homer Simpson Work at WPPSS?

No, it's not "The Simpsons." But with the latest round of safety goofs, pranks, and financial bungles, the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) Plant No. 2 on the Hanford Nuclear Reservation might as well have Homer at the controls. Pass the doughnuts and read on:

In February, Benton, a one-fourth owner of the Colorado Rockies baseball team, filed for bankruptcy with nearly $500 million in debts and only $40 million in assets, according to the Rocky Mountain News. Once the Tri-City Herald got wind of this, and revealed that the unsecured sale of uranium violated WPPSS policies, the executive resignations came quickly. Now WPPSS has to get in line with the rest of Benton's creditors. That's a new perspective for a public agency which has the dubious distinction of creating the biggest municipal bond default in the nation's history: $2.5 billion.

With a track record like this, it's no surprise that in 1993 WPPSS Plant No. 2 was ranked the most unsafe nuclear plant in the country by the Critical Mass Energy Project, a study of nuclear safety in the U.S. sponsored by Public Citizen. In a memo last summer following repeated safety and security violations, WPPSS managing director Bill Counsil wrote to all the Homers in his command: "To put it bluntly, behavior such as this could lead to the shutdown of Plant 2 and the termination of the Supply System if we do not nip it in the bud immediately." We should be so lucky.

-Eric Nelson

To e-mail Eric Nelson:
WAfreepress@gmail.com



Oh, Those Silly Natural Cleaning Products
So what if many household cleaners contain bleach, lye or acid which can irritate your lungs, corrode your skin and blind you.

They still get your whites their whitest.
The Clorox Company wants you to know that their products still clean MUCH BETTER than those silly "natural" household products (in a recent press release, the Clorox Company actually managed to make the attribute "environmentally friendly" sound like a dirty word).
To prove their point, company officials conducted "comparison tests" of their own products - including Clorox bleach, Tilex Soap Scum Remover and 409 Glass and Surface Cleaner, among others - with home substitutes such as vinegar and baking soda.
The results?
"Home substitutes products such as vinegar, baking soda, hydrogen peroxide, lemon juice, washing soda and borax are not as effective in cleaning and disinfecting as commercial products specifically formulated for these jobs,'' the press release from Clorox heralding the studies announces.
Take the cleaning study, for example.
The spot-removing powers of Clorox Bleach was compared to four alternatives - vinegar, borax, baking soda and hydrogen peroxide - on mustard, tea and ink stains.
"None of the alternatives was as effective as household bleach in removing common stains," the press release says.
What the Clorox Company failed to mention was that bleach can irritate the lungs, inflaming a host of respiratory infections from asthma to allergies, said Philip Dickey, household toxics project director for the Washington Toxics Coalition.
Dickey has written a book analyzing the toxicity levels of numerous household cleaners. While he says some cleaners are mild and fairly safe to use, he doesn't advocate writing off "natural" products because they don't clean a spot quite as well.
"We recommend people use the least hazardous cleaner for the job," Dickey said, adding later, "To dismiss the whole idea of do-it-yourself home remedies is wrong."
An example:
Most oven cleaners include lye, a substance which in large amounts can irritate skin and eyes. There are two-alternatives, Dickey says. Easy Off makes a "non-caustic" product. But a mixture of baking soda and soap will also do the trick.
"I don't doubt that specially formulated cleaning products do generally clean better," he said. "But there is a range, and some natural cleaners are effective enough."
And really, how white do those whites need to be, anyway?

-Leah Kohlenberg



UW's Enviro Studies Program Gets Pulped
If an environmental studies program gets axed in the tangled bramble of academia and no one is there to hear it fall, does it really make any noise? Well, UW students and faculty can wax philosophical on that one all summer long, but it won't change the fact that the university's Institute for Environmental Studies has come crashing down like so much old growth.

In last December's issue (Issue 13) of the Free Press, we documented how the pro-timber industry bias of top administrators, coupled with internal conflicts within the Institute, contributed to the UW's decision to eliminate the two-decade old program. The uproar over what appeared to be a rash decision forced the university to follow its written procedures for program elimination. The result was the formation of a Review Committee which closely examined the arguments for and against elimination of the Institute.
The committee concluded that "the Institute constitutes a unique resource for the university and the region in interdisciplinary environmental education, research, and service," and noted the continuing need for a strong, interdisciplinary center to counter the ever-present pressures for departmental parochialism.
The committee countered the administration's claims of significant budget savings from eliminating the Institute, reporting that if an environmental curriculum were to be maintained, as the university has proposed, the actual savings over two years would not exceed $350,000.
Did such a strong review lead to a second life for the beleaguered Institute? Nope. Dale Johnson, the acting Dean of the Graduate School, decided to axe it anyway. An appeal board was convened, which reversed the findings of the Review Committee. The appeal board focused on previous internal conflicts between the Institute's administration and faculty, rather than on its demonstrated success in recent years in increasing undergraduate enrollment and building bridges with other academic departments.
The UW claims that it retains a commitment to environmental studies, and has proposed that an Environmental Studies Task Force be convened to re-invent the curriculum from scratch. Given the recent past, and in the current financial and political climate, only close scrutiny by a broad public will prevent it being reincarnated as a narrow, Weyerhauser-friendly program.

-Mark Gardner




[Home] [This Issue's Directory] [WFP Index] [WFP Back Issues] [E-Mail WFP]

Contents on this page were published in the June/July, 1995 edition of the Washington Free Press.
WFP, 1463 E. Republican #178, Seattle, WA -USA, 98112. -- WAfreepress@gmail.com
Copyright © 1995 WFP Collective, Inc.