ENVIROWATCH

HOW HUMANS TREAT
THEIR SURROUNDINGS,
EACH OTHER, THEMSELVES





Monsanto To Milk Drinkers:
'Trust Us'

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of somatotropin, a growth hormone that makes cows give even more milk, according to the Nov. 8 Wall Street Journal. The drug, which was found through "extensive scientific and government testing" to not change the nutritional value of milk or meat, is manufactured and marketed by Monsanto Co. of St. Louis.

Monsanto, if you haven't heard, has an environmental record to rival that of Waste Management Inc. According to information provided by the Chicago Greenpeace office, Monsanto is the third largest U.S. chemical company in the country. They invented PCBs, manufactured Agent Orange, parathion, and currently manufacture and dispose of huge amounts of chemicals associated with dioxin.
The EPA says Monsanto releases more toxic chemicals into this country's environment each year than any other company except DuPont. Here are a few of the company's most celebrated troubles:


In seeking FDA approval for somatotropin, Monsanto has graciously agreed to conduct its own post-approval monitoring program to ensure the safety of milk.
The substance, which will be marketed under the name Posilac, is already exported to Latin America, Asia and Africa, as well as Eastern Europe, Greenpeace says. The company cannot sell the drug for 90 days in the U.S. under a moratorium included in the federal budget by Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis)




Disposable Education

Environmental leaders throughout the country are asking state officials to investigate a school curriculum developed by consumer-product giant Procter & Gamble. In a letter to Washington Attorney General Christine Gregoire, six Washington environmental groups charge that the "educational materials" are nothing more than advertisements and should be subject to deceptive trade practices standards.

As part of its school curriculum program, P&G has been distributing a "Student Worksheet" where kids can calculate water and energy consumption, atmospheric emissions and waste associated with disposable and cloth diapers, and then compare the two types of diapers.
P&G thoughtfully provided their own data based on "product life cycle analyses" performed by industry-hired consultants, which indicate that disposable diapers are more environmentally friendly than cloth. P&G, makers of Pampers and Luvs, sells more disposable diapers than any company in the country.
Wanting to help junior-high school students make "informed consumer product choices," P&G says "life cycle analysis can help young consumers think about the impact of their purchase beyond where they fit in the cycle."
According to Washington Citizens for Recycling, however, the concept is an advertising ploy designed to downplay the environmental impacts of single-use products like disposable diapers. On top of that, guidelines from the Federal Trade Commission and a consortium of state attorneys general say the tactic cannot be used in advertising. So P&G turned to schools, instead.
"We are not surprised to see Procter & Gamble trying to sell Pampers to teenagers," said Jan Click, WCR's executive director. "But we are shocked to see school curriculum based on information which regulators prohibit the company from using in its product advertising."




War On Dioxin Cranks Up

The Environmental Protection Agency will act to reduce emissions of dioxins and other toxins from more than 350 paper and pulp mills across the country. The EPA ruling will combine, for the first time, the efforts of the agency's air and water oversight capacities.

As usual, the paper industry believes the stricter regulations will result in job loss and mill closures, while environmentalist claim the rules come to little, too late. Depending on who one believes, dioxin is either one of the most carcinogenic substances known to mankind or an unproven, relatively benign but necessary by-product of paper bleaching. The ruling will not be implemented until late 1994, unless the paper industry shreds it first.
Doing its part to reduce the amount of dioxins in the environment is the Washington Toxics Coalition, whose fall 1993 issue of Alternatives makes a plea for non-chlorine bleaching and presents some of the real facts about the problems of dioxins and chlorine bleaching. To get a copy of the publication, contact WTC at 4516 University Way NE, Seattle 98105, or call 632-1545.




Gore's Waste About-Face

The November/December issue of Mother Jones outlines in cataclysmic detail just how inadequate this country's hazardous-waste disposal policy really is.

In an article plaintively titled "Where Are You Al?", author L.J. Davis reminds us that then-Vice President-elect Al Gore promised that a hazardous waste incinerator built in Ohio by the partnership including Waste Technologies Industries would not be permitted to operate until a full investigation had been completed.
Well, the investigation never materialized, and the incinerator operates 400 YARDS from an elementary school, 300 FEET from nearby houses and even closer to the Ohio River, where many of the people in East Liverpool get their drinking water.
The school's emergency plan calls for a strategy of 'sheltering in place,' which means herding 400 children into the school cafeteria within three minutes and sealing the room by stuffing wax paper and tinfoil in the cracks and taping with duct tape.




Abortion Or Breast Cancer:
You Choose

A lovely pink-colored three-page ad in the Nov. 25 Rolling Stone warns users of Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection of potential side effects.

Which would you rather have, lady, an unwanted pregnancy or the following:
Irregular menstrual bleeding, bone mineral changes, an accidental or extopic pregnancy, weight gain, headaches, nervousness, abdominal cramps, dizziness, weakness or fatigue, decreased sexual desire, leg cramps, nausea, vaginal irritation, breast swelling, bloating, swelling of the hands/feet, backaches, depression, insomnia, acne, pelvic pain, excessive hair loss, rashes and hot flashes, convulsions, jaundice, urinary tract infections, allergic reactions, fainting, paralysis, osteoporosis, lack of return to fertility, deep vein thrombosis, breast cancer or cervical cancer?
Luckily, though it does not affect a woman's ability to produce mild and can be used by nursing mothers. That's what it says.




AND...




[
Home] [This Issue's Directory] [WFP Index] [WFP Back Issues] [E-Mail WFP]

Contents on this page were published in the December/Jan, 1994 edition of the Washington Free Press.
WFP, 1463 E. Republican #178, Seattle, WA -USA, 98112. -- WAfreepress@gmail.com
Copyright © 1993 WFP Collective, Inc.