SPIKE

THE RABID
MEDIA
WATCHDOG



Chomsky Film Rips Timid Mass Media

We would like to say that this film needs no introduction. But thanks, in part, to the queasiness of the United States' mainstream media, "Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media" is not yet a household movie title.

It soon will be.

Already the winner of 10 American and international awards, "Manufacturing Consent" has at last embarked on a tour of the United States - nearly a year after a test print was first shown to a standing-room-only film festival crowd in Sydney, Australia. (Though already broadcast on television overseas, only 10 of the 350 PBS stations in the U.S. expressed even the slightest interest.) It sold out at the Seattle International Film Festival last month and is scheduled to return to the Neptune Theatre June 10-16 (though a high turnout can always extend a film's run - remember "Panama Deception"?).

Culling the Best of Chomsky from more than 120 hours of footage spanning 25 years, 23 cities and seven countries, Montreal filmmakers Mark Achbar and Peter Wintonick enlighten viewers to Chomsky's words and ideas, bombard them with a wonderfully choppy editing style, and weave it all together with an onslaught of metaphorical sounds and images that serve to cement Chomsky's main points.

As the title and even a cursory knowledge of Chomsky's philosophy reveals, the film explores the intellectual dissident's views of how the mass media of the United States "manufacture" an artificial "consent" among the populace by playing up news stories that benefit the political and corporate powers that be, while subjugating stories that might challenge decision-makers' wisdom. This system also serves the media themselves, Chomsky says, by perpetuating corporate media structures that depend on strong relationships with a stable, unimpeachable government.

The U.S. mainstream media, Chomsky says in language much more eloquent than we can emulate, represent nothing more than a funnel through which government propaganda flows into the minds of the masses. As a result, most Americans, without the benefit of an analytical, challenging news media, simply adopt those force-fed views.

Simple theory. Complicated underpinnings. Perverse results.

"What the media are doing," Chomsky says in the film, "is ensuring that we do not act on our own responsibilities. And that the interests of power are served, not the needs of the suffering people and not even the needs of the American people who would be horrified if they realized the blood that's dripping from their hands because of the way they are allowing themselves to be deluded and manipulated by the system."

While this sums up Chomsky's overall view of the mass media in the US, he was referring specifically to how mainstream news people heretofore have virtually ignored the 1975 invasion and subsequent brutalization of East Timor by Indonesia, a US ally. This blind eye was turned while the same media practiced pack journalism in covering Pol Pot's devastation in the late 1970s of Cambodia, a US enemy.

Open skull. Insert funnel. Start pouring.

"Look at the evidence that's been accumulated about the way the major media, the agenda-setting media ... shape and control the kinds of opinions that appear," Chomsky says during a radio interview in Laramie, Wyo. "I think [you] will find some very surprising things about the democratic system."

The sheer volume of material covered in this nearly three-hour film - five years in the making - is overwhelming. From a confrontation with William F. Buckley Jr., to fielding a question from a neanderthalic University of Wyoming student, to debating philosopher Michel Foucault, to being interviewed on KUOW radio, Chomsky is revealed, even as he is occasionally reviled.

But one cannot underestimate the political and social enormity of a film that seeks at once to introduce Chomsky's views to the informed and novice alike, spark a debate over crucial media-and-democracy questions, and, at some level, profile a man who, despite his 25-year forced exile from pop political culture, is said to be the most frequently cited author living today.

"We wanted to use the media as a window to show how he feels about other issues ... To give people an introduction to his general political analysis and philosophy," co-director Achbar said in an interview. "I didn't know the film would expand to become this."

Achbar is encouraging those interested in the film to help promote it. He and Wintonick can be reached at Necessary Illusions, 10 Pine West, Suite 315, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2W 1P9, or by calling (514) 287-7337.



Community Catalyst Folds

In a bittersweet epitaph, Community Catalyst founder and leader Lance Scott announced that the publication's May 1993 edition would be its last.

"We got volunteer assistance ... We got community support from businesses, organizations and individual contributors. But the core group [of staffers] never coalesced," Scott wrote. "That surprises me in a city the size and progressive disposition of Seattle, with all the expressed support for what we were trying to do. I'm not sure what it means."

In the emotional page 2 message to readers, Scott spoke of how collectivism and cooperation can yield positive changes in any community. He spoke of how the Catalyst - Seattle's last independent, politically oriented publication - strove to be a unifying tool for Seattle's diverse social, political and environmental activist community.

"A shared instrument of communication ... would serve as a valuable resource for individuals concerned about various issues and seeking opportunities for involvement."

But Scott, as the Catalyst's sole catalyst (as it were), said he wasn't able to assemble a large enough group of dedicated volunteers to grow the publication as he had hoped. Wearing every hat possible, Scott said he averaged about $1.50 an hour over the publication's three-year run.

Adding to the paper's problems, he said, was competition from other local publications for readers and advertisers, the recession, and a "lack of support from a few key businesses in the alternative community."

"Now the project's dead."

Scott thanked the dozens of volunteers and businesses who supported the magazine, whose respectability and popularity grew steadily since it began in April 1990. The Catalyst, with a monthly circulation of 5,000-10,000, was housed in the office of Intentional Future, a resource center and meeting place in the University Heights Center for the Community.

Scott, 34, worked with a publication similar to the Catalyst in Portland, Ore., before moving to Seattle in 1988.

We wish him the best.



Fancher Continues Half-Assed Ways

Last month, we told you about The Seattle Times' new "Reader Forum," a group of "regular" people who Times editor Michael Fancher wanted to assemble after taking a beating over his embarrassingly vacuous "Inside the Times" column. Later in May, Fancher printed brief bio's on the 13 people he hopes will help shape the future of the newspaper - a sort of citizen advisory panel.

But, with all due respect to the panelists, the selection process reflects the same detached attitude that got Fancher in trouble with readers in the first place.

"There really wasn't a selection process," forum member Walter Oelwein told us. "I think he picked me because of my interesting job title."

The 24-year-old Capitol Hill resident is a "game counselor" for Nintendo. Oelwein answers telephone calls from people who, for example, can't get past a certain point on their Super Mario Brothers game.

"[Fancher] didn't really say too much when he called me," Oelwein said.

We're not saying that Oelwein, a dedicated Times reader, wasn't a good choice. But how could Fancher make such a decision after reading one letter from a guy he's never met and hasn't talked to for more than a minute?

Other forum members include a former Chamber of Commerce director, a home-school adviser, a software developer and a prominent Central District activist. While these folks seem like good choices, one wonders whether Fancher's half-hearted selection process has fated the forum to be a blind watchdog.

One positive sign is the number of news media people on the panel: zero.



Tidbits




[
Home] [This Issue's Directory] [WFP Index] [WFP Back Issues] [E-Mail WFP]

Contents on this page were published in the June, 1993 edition of the Washington Free Press.
WFP, 1463 E. Republican #178, Seattle, WA -USA, 98112. -- WAfreepress@gmail.com
Copyright © 1993 WFP Collective, Inc.